Workers Compensation is a set of laws that prohibit an employee from suing his employer. This is a type of tort reform! Workers compensation takes care of the employee in the event that he or she is involved in a work related accident. It provides the following coverage:
1. 1. Replacement for loss of income (66% while recovering from a work related injury).
2. A settlement to compensate in the event there is a permanent physical injury.
3. Unlimited medical coverage for the injury.
This is an effective and successful program; however, the cost is skewed.
The second part of this section focuses on the cost distribution of workers compensation and is not pertinent to a medical tort reform. However it important to us to take the time and illustrate how the cost of social insurances effects the creation of jobs, particularly amongst Americas' labor force. I think you see that when we discuss the cost of labor that employers are not complaining about wage of American worker but employers are outrage at the cost of benefits programs and the rampart abuses of these programs.
The price of workers' compensation for many labor classes is between $10 and $15 per hundred dollars of payroll. For example, if a truck driver earns $50,000 per year, the cost to his employer for Workers compensation may be as much as $7,500 annually (rates vary from state to state). On the other hand, the cost of worker's compensation for an office personel may be .24 per hundred dollar of payroll. That is $120 annually for the office worker and $6,000 for the truck driver, assuming they both make $50,000 per year.
The difference of cost is associated with the risk of that occupation. Therefore, in some ways you could say that it is fair distribution of cost. Unfortunately, the result is that some employers are being squeezed out of business and can't survive.
If Workers compensation is highly utilized (in terms of dollar amount paid for claims), the employer can be subjected to an additional surcharge of up to 30%.
In most cases, employees, executives, and politicians are oblivious of the cost impact of this program on our labor force.
We need to redistributing the cost of workers compensation across the board for all occupations. The cost of the workers compensation can not be of the magnatude that employers elect to "not hire" employees but hire workers as subcontractors instead.
This result has already happen in the non-union residential remodeling and residential construction industries. This change happen prior to the collapse of our residential construction.